Tipping Strippers with text messages.

  • Recent Keywords

  • Last Three Posts

  • Categories

  • Your Account

  • Tipping Strippers with text messages.


    February 26, 2010

    Books go to eReaders. Magazines go to the web. Dollar bills to your cell phones.

    The debate of the death of printing has existed since lithography dominated the industry in 1796. The strongest argument, coinciding with the New Media/Social Media movement, deals with the integration of real-time technology and moving print into the archiving world. Even so, the Internet has forced print based companies, Newspapers for instance, to re-think their business model. The debate for print’s demise, which was referenced here in 2007, has shed light on a new face: currency.

    Since the founding days in the United States, currency has existed in a multitude of media—most popularly the coin and paper dollar. In the 1920’s the credit card, originally printed on paper card stock then sheet metal, because a popular use of currency. In fact, today about 20 billion credit cards—in plastic form, sometimes with internal memory chips)—are produced each year.

    While a credit card digitized information on a tangible media, the first step in the full digitalization of currency came about in 1998 when PayPal was founded. After about four years, the widely used auction web site, eBay, acquired PayPal giving it the credibility and ease that it is known for today. This was the first “standard” in moving currency between people and businesses.

    Today, however, there is a new service in BETA testing called, Venmo. Building on the PayPal concept, these services allows you to quickly and easily transfer money to a friend or business via SMS (text message). Although this may not be a long-term company, it does pose an interesting question. Are we getting too digital? Are we leaving ourselves too open to hackers or digital corruption? Does tangible currency provide a real sense of value? Will we spend too freely if it is that easy? If the currency move did go digital, would it cut down on corruption and illegal activity by providing a “paper trail”? And, most importantly, does this mean a stripper would have your cell phone number?


    area code


    January 27, 2010

    SIT Grammont Desk Telephone, images curtosousy of sparkmuseum.com

    Area codes used to mean something. They represented who you were, by associating yourself with a geographical location. When you heard “212” you knew New York City, “508” Central Massachusetts, or “315” as the Boonies. The area code was what identified who you were and where you were from. Even as a child we were able to quickly learn that “800″ numbers were good and “900″ numbers would get the young inquiring minds into trouble.

    As we look at our antiquated phone infrastructure based on the population growth (Currently at a 0.915% annual change according to a 2008 study by the World Bank, World Development Indicators) [ awesome interactive population map by BreathingEarth ], we can assume that area codes will be (if not are already) irrelevant. Even if you live in the heart of Manhattan you won’t be able to get a “212″ and if you are in Boston, good luck with the “617″. There will soon be more people than numbers, and because of this growth geographic restrictions are being lifted on the numbers being issued.

    In addition to the growth of population, we have the problem of multiple people having multiple numbers. While landlines are decreasing to the same rates as the early 1990s (who still uses land lines?), VOIP (most notably, Skype), cell phones, and other broadband-based voice content are taking up new numbers. It is easy to get a phone number, simply by joining Google’s Voice (now available to iPhone), you are able to register a number whose primary purpose is to forward calls to whichever phone you want it to go to… which is a good way to increase privacy. After all, once a phone number of a celebrity is leaked to the Internet, said celebrity is quick to change their phone number—what a pain to notify their friends about their new number.

    At what point will the phone number infrastructure change? Should we do away with numbers? Could we? After all, numbers are the only universal language.


    What’s Mine is Yours… unless it is digital.


    January 13, 2010

    What does it mean to buy something? One is able to go to a grocery store, purchase some food, bring it home, prepare it, and ultimately, consume it. That food, once giving the teller your money, is yours to eat, play with or let sit in your refrigerator until it is past its expiration date. What about when you buy something that is created by someone else? Like, a CD (what the hell is a CD?) for example. To answer your question, we look at Congress in 1992 in passing the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) (P.L. 102-563, 106 Stat. 4237, codified at 17 U.S.C. 1001 – 1010), this act would lead you to believe that non-commercial duplicates fall under the fair use clause—although it hasn’t been tested in court. Many labels, however, indicate that their music CDs cannot be duplicated, even if you want to have one copy in your house and one copy in your car. In fact, if you buy that CD and want to sell it at a yard sale, can you?

    Today, however, we are posed with a similar but more complex question about media ownership in the digital age. Especially, when traditional media (compact disks, DVDs, and now, books) are now offering non-physical copies for consumers to “buy.” One of the newest craves is “buying” books via Amazon.com to download and read on their digital reader, the Kindle. According to their license agreement (an annotated version can be read here) it appears that we are not actually buying the book, but instead “taking a license to a limited set of uses” (according to Cory Doctorow’s article, Even Amazon can’t keep its EULA story straight).

    As my previous article, Down with Physical Media!, mentions digital media is becoming increasingly the norm. In fact, this week, Nintendo announced that their entertainment system, Wii, (which sold over 3-million units in December 2009) would now offer an integration with Netflix to allow a user to watch their Netflix rentals through their Nintendo Wii.

    Now, personally, I am OCD. I enjoy having bookshelves neatly filled—sometimes sub-sorted by the spine’s color pallet. But I am intrigued by the idea of having everything digitized so that I could watch a movie on any TV just by linking it to my computer or to an on-line video rental service. I have no problem having someone else maintain my collection, so long as I have access to it whenever I want and do not need to pay any more than I would have to in “owning” a physical copy. My fear? That by losing absolute control of the media, there could be glitches that would require me to re-purchase, not have the files on demand, or be forced into “upgrading” for better quality (much like Apple did with the DRM free music).

    Do we own the content? No. But is it accessible? Yes. Does this format enable other users to interact, recommend, and share similar interests? Yes. Pros outweigh the cons? I think so—so far.


    Down with Physical Media!


    December 28, 2009

    Jay Gatsby was known for, amongst other things, being deceitful with a library of books that he had never read. After reading this scene from The Great Gatsby, I too can remember a time that I had purchased the beautiful 10-volume set of History of Mathematics, from a library’s nickle book sale, for the sole purpose of looking good on my bookshelf. One shelf below, I could recollect a pretty incredible collection of DVDs that was started right when DVDs became cool—around 1997—which are now breathing their last breath of relevance.

    Media has a limited life cycle before it is quickly replaced by newer media. Much like how my DVDs replaced my VHS, and CDs replaced my compact cassettes—in fact, the last CD I purchased was in 1999, because it was much easier to have an MP3 library (and this was before portable music players).

    We have come to an interesting point in our lives—our media is being replaced by the anti-media. Similar to how the Internet is competing with the printed word, digital bytes compete directly with physical digital media containers.

    AppleTVAfter installing my first Apple TV this past December, I realized that my shelves are going to be very lonely much sooner than I thought. Not only does Apple TV play my movies and music off of my computer (wirelessly, might I add) but, through services such as iTunes, I am able to buy and rent movies whenever the mood strikes my fancy. I don’t need to go to a store in hopes of them having the movie or album, nor do I need to order it on-line and wait for it to be mailed—I get the content I want, when I want it.

    The movie rental industry was first shaken up by NetFlix who would eliminate the rental fees and time/distance problems created by physical movie rental stores. To compete, these physical stores (i.e., Blockbuster), started to mail DVDs and offer a “return service” so people could drop off the rented DVDs at their stores. In 2004, Redbox was created as a viable rental option by placing vending machine style units at high-traffic areas (gas stations, etc) and offered an affordable rental plan ($1.00/day).

    Amazon.com reported, on December 26th, that it sold more eBooks for the Kindle than physical books. Although the actual number is not revealed, it is interesting to see all fronts (books, music, and video) are making a very quick push to be digital.

    Today, all we need is a hard drive (and a back-up hard drive to prevent against file corruption or data loss) and means to connect to that hard drive. If F. Scott Fitzgerald’s wrote The Great Gatsby today instead of it 1925, what would Jay Gatsby have on his shelves? How does this affect child and parent interaction in education?


    Don’t let content slow you down: Google FastFlip


    December 21, 2009

    A great experience with print is that the reader dictates how quickly they spend finding and reading content. Unlike with the printed page, digital advertisers have a lot of technologies available to them to deter the reader’s attention from the content and focus on their advertisement. Whether it is a non-obtrusive technique—like a simple banner ad or muted video—or a very obtrusive technique—like forcing the user to click a “close” or “ignore” button to remove an ad from overlaying on the content—these advertisers can hinder the user’s experience in searching and reading content.

    Google-Fast-FlipTo eliminate some of the headache for the user Google introduced FastFlip. This service, currently in Google Labs, offers a means to replicate the tactile experience of a printed source. According to their explanation,

    Fast Flip is a new reading experience that combines the best elements of print and online articles. Like a print magazine, Fast Flip lets you browse sequentially through bundles of recent news, headlines and popular topics, as well as feeds from individual top publishers…. Fast Flip also personalizes the experience for you, by taking cues from selections you make to show you more content from sources, topics and journalists that you seem to like.

    Gigaom asks whether or not Google is planning on becoming the media company which is a heavily debated topic. Regardless of one’s stance on the debate, Google FastFlip is very convenient method to choose which news sources you want to “thumb through” without having to be subjected to irrelevant information or clumsy advertising content.


    Older Posts »